I really thought that this, the Book of Job, was one of the most interesting and though provoking stories I had encountered yet in the Bible. It has been one of the Books so far, I feel, that deals most in theological questions and philosophies that are still very relevant in religious discussion today. Rather than discussing the activities and conflicts of various ancient peoples and their personal alliances with a God who seemed to be more interested in “results” than “discussion,” the Book of Job discusses philosophical questions regarding God’s nature. In the Books of Exodus and Leviticus, for instance, when God spent much time explaining to Moses all of the precise laws, commandments, and ceremonies that He wanted of his followers, neither Moses nor God seemed to spend much time in ruminations about the reasons “why.” Job and his acquaintances, however, question and debate, focusing in particular on one of the biggest questions religion tries to answer; why do bad things happen to good people? Or, more specifically, “the problem of evil.”
Job tells the tale of the eponymous Job, a prosperous, happy, and god-fearing man who had everything that a Bronze Age shepherd could want. However, Satan, “the adversary” was curious if his piousness would suffer under “adversity” and convinced God to test Job, Satan predicting Job will “curse thee to thy face” as soon as things started to go bad. (Job 1:11) God agrees to this wager and before the first chapter is completed, Job loses his entire fortune and all of his children to a series of tragedies. Apparently, this not being enough, the next chapter has God, again at the instigation of Satan, allowing “My servant Job … a blameless and upright man” (Job 2:3) to be smote by Satan with boils completely covering his body. Incidentally, this Satan, or adversary, character and its relationship to God is never explained here. Interestingly, Satan appears with a group called the “Sons of God,” whose appearance I didn’t catch at first. Besides sounding like some sort of sect or metal band, these beings are, according to exhaustive research on Wikipedia, a “divine council” of minor gods, apparently a remnant of earlier Ugaritic religions. Interesting, but these guys are a bit outside of my discussion today.
So poor Job is in a pretty sorry state, “he took a potsherd to scrape himself while he was sitting among the ashes.” That’s a pretty bleak scene, and his wife exhorts him to “curse God and die” (Job 2:9) but Job, not being a “foolish woman” refuses to complain. It remains unsaid here whether he knows or not that God was personally responsible for allowing all of these bad things to happen by allowing Satan to have its way. This brings up many questions. Why did God allow “the adversary” (is Satan simply a personification of all the bad things in the world?) to torture Job so horribly when he was, by His own admission one of his most faithful followers? Does this make God, directly or indirectly, responsible for every bad event? Questions like these are discussed in the following chapters as Job’s friends hear of his unfortunate circumstances and arrive to talk to him. They find Job in such pain, that they simply watch him silently for a week (apparently it being bad form to offer help).
Finally, Job begins to question the injustice of his current situation, cursing his birth and asking “why is light given to a man whose way is hidden, and whom God has hedged in?” (Job 3:23). His friends Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar attempt to convince him that all of this is in some way Job’s fault, for being a sinner, Eliphaz claiming “who ever punished being innocent?” (4:7), though Job continues to refute that he had sinned, saying “I have not denied the words of the Holy One. We are given no reason to doubt this, as God himself praised Job’s “god-fearingness.” These three have to believe that evil does not happen for no reason, goodness is only rewarded and evil is only punished. Therefore, Job must have committed some evil somewhere along the line. Bildad in fact asserts “how then can a man be just with God? Or how can he be clean who is born of woman,” (Job 25:4), apparently putting it down to original sin that all humans are simply born with, as if this gives bad things full reign. Job does not accept this interpretation. Another friend of Job’s, Elihu, attempts (beginning in Chapter 32) to answer these questions by maintaining that whatever God does is righteous and, basically, it is not up to humanity to question his motives or look for a reason. Elihu asks, “If you are righteous, what do you give to HIM? Or what does He receive from your hand?” (35:7) This seems to argue that nothing humanity does effects God, who, as he argues later, “is exalted, and we do not know Him.” (36:26). Therefore, it is not for humanity to say and fruitless to look for an explanation (except that, to the readers of the text, an explanation is provided in the first chapter; God was goaded by Satan to test Job’s faith.)
Finally, God himself comes down from on high and personally gives His side of the story, thundering from the heavens complete with lightenings and whirlwinds, making for quite the impressive display. God snaps at Job to “gird up your loins like a man” (38:3) as he asks Job “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth!” or “Have you ever in your life commanded the morning and caused the dawn to know its place” (38:12). Basically, if you didn’t create the universe, don’t complain. In the end, though, after this Divine chewing out, God does reward the always faithful Job by restoring his wealth and prestige (one set of children is as good as another, right?). No matter that this infallible God basically screws with Job for no other reason than a bet with some undefined adversary. However, the arguments and discussions of Job and his friends about God’s nature and how to reconcile this with the existence of evil and suffering in the world are quite fascinating even if I find much of their arguments unconvincing. This makes the Book one of the most theologically and philosophically interesting parts of the Bible
However, as an agnostic reader of the Bible, I find much of the arguments put forward to be rather unconvincing, to say the least. The rest of the essay may be a bit, er, ranty. The arguments put forward here may illustrate one of the deep disagreements I seem to have with the religion. The relationship between the creator and his subjects seems rather abusive, when looked at through modern eyes. God tortures Job, one of his most loyal subjects terribly on a whim, but Job still loves Him in spite of the pain he suffered. Finally, Job breaks down and questions why so many bad things happen to him, debating the matter with his friends. Was it because Job was secretly sinful? They can’t say. Finally, God explains himself that the reason for all this pain suffered by Job was beyond their ken, as they did not create the Universe. So God created the Universe, that gives Him the right to treat His subjects in whatever fashion He likes? Of course, God would have knowledge and power humans could never understand, causing his actions to be, theoretically, inscrutable. Then why did God’s reason seem to amount to little more than a test? Job seemed to pass the test, but millions of other people still suffer. Have they not passed the test yet? This is a vision of God that I simply cannot come to terms with. I will have to study this in more detail to come to a more comprehensive philosophical argument against the arguments put forward in Job. How do others understand this Book? I can definitely see how this might be among the most important works in the Old Testament and I’m curious to look at some modern interpretations of this text. I’ll definitely return to the Book of Job as I explore how other religions come to answer the “problem of evil.”
I love this post! I have a friend who references the Book of Job often because she subscribes to the belief that Job is a role model of faith — when things get bad for her, she looks to him for a reminder that God doesn’t hate you/hasn’t forgotten you if bad things are happening. I’d really been looking forward to reading the Book of Job and was disappointed that I didn’t actually get that much out of it, but I can see why it is a cornerstone of Christian theology.
I’m also glad you included your rant. I agree with you — the relationship between God and His creatures is definitely abusive and a terrible model for relationship in general (although, I think the purpose is probably to teach “humility.” But being humble shouldn’t mean that you have to be humiliated but one who always gets to hold all the cards.) I once attended a lecture by Bishop John Shelby Spong — I think you’d really like his work. Anyway, he posited that until Christians can get over their attachment to an abusive God, we’re doomed to be an abusive people, continuously breeding new generations of abusers, and that, for our own good and the good of others, we NEED to let go of this type of theology (which I totally agree with.)
A friend of mine once described the Bible as “the highest morality humans were capable of at the time.” If humanity is continuously evolving morally (which I believe they are), then at this point we *should* be striving for higher ideals and a more complex interpretation of right and wrong. But at the time that each book in the Bible was written, it was radical for its time, pushing humanity to the next level of morality that they were capable of at the time. For example, we can shake our head at the “immorality” of believing God wants whole nations slaughtered, but the earliest books in the Bible also extol a basic decency — caring for widows and orphans, not being overly abusive to slaves, allowing immigrants to live within your community. The problem comes when we take this “bare bones” morality and assume it’s still enough for a more evolved humanity — it’s not.
I think Job represents a “next step” in the moral evolution of humanity — the realization that when bad happens to another human being, it’s NOT necessarily his fault, a mind-shift that can lead from a judgmental attitude to a compassionate one toward those suffering hardship.
Comment by Lacey Louwagie — February 19, 2011 @ 1:47 pm
Hey, I’m really glad you enjoyed it! I was afraid I might have gotten a bit long winded with this one. I do like the idea that humanity is evolving in a moral sense to lead to a world with less injustice and violence and one in which people can live in more harmony with each other and the environment, and I hope that we are evolving towards this. However, on the other hand I also believe that human emotions, at least, have remained the same throughout history. Interesting that “the Problem of Evil” took so long to be introduced.
I had not seen Job’s conclusion that evil is not a direct consequence of actions anywhere else in the Bible so far. The idea that people deserve only and exactly what they get is rejected, but other parts in the Bible seem to dispute this (even in Psalms, I’ve noted). Even today, I feel many people are not entirely convinced.
I will definitely look for Bishop Spong’s work. His views sound intriguing.
Comment by spoonbridge — February 28, 2011 @ 8:00 pm